Stable thyroid function despite regular use of povidone-iodine throat spray for SARS-CoV-2 prophylaxis.

BACKGROUND: It is unclear whether unintentional ingestion of povidone-iodine following its application to the oropharyngeal space could affect thyroid function. OBJECTIVE: To examine thyroid function among individuals who regularly apply povidone-iodine throat spray for SARS-CoV-2 prophylaxis. METHODS: We designed a case-control study to compare thyroid function among participants who received povidone-iodine throat spray three times a day for 42 days ('cases') and those who received vitamin C ('controls'). Thyroid function was assessed by profiling serum TSH, free T3, and free T4; iodine status was estimated using serum thyroglobulin level, while infection status was determined by measuring anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody against the nucleocapsid antigen. All measurements were performed in pairs, at baseline and 42 days later. Pre-post changes in thyroid function were compared between groups, before and after stratification according to baseline TSH quartiles. RESULTS: A total of 177 men (117 cases and 60 controls) (mean age, 32.2 years) were included. Despite comparable demographics and clinical profiles, no clinically or statistically significant differences were observed in thyroid indices between 'cases' and 'controls' before and after stratification according to TSH quartiles. None of the participants developed symptomatic hypo- or hyperthyroidism throughout the study. Post-hoc analysis did not reveal differences in thyroid function according to infection status. CONCLUSIONS: Data from this study support the overall safety of povidone-iodine use in the oropharyngeal space for SARS-CoV-2 prophylaxis among individuals with normal thyroid function and subclinical thyroid disease.

Estimating transmission dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 at different intraspatial levels in an institutional outbreak.

INTRODUCTION: Large, localised outbreaks of COVID-19 have been repeatedly reported in high-density residential institutions. Understanding the transmission dynamics will inform outbreak response and the design of living environments that are more resilient to future outbreaks. METHODS: We developed an individual-based, multilevel transmission dynamics model using case, serology and symptom data from a 60-day cluster randomised trial of prophylaxes in a densely populated foreign worker dormitory in Singapore. Using Bayesian data augmentation, we estimated the basic reproduction number and the contribution that within-room, between-level and across-block transmission made to it, and the prevalence of infection over the study period across different spatial levels. We then simulated the impact of changing the building layouts in terms of floors and blocks on outbreak size. RESULTS: We found that the basic reproduction number was 2.76 averaged over the different putative prophylaxes, with substantial contributions due to transmission beyond the residents' rooms. By the end of ~60 days of follow up, prevalence was 64.4 % (95 % credible interval 64.2-64.6 %). Future outbreak sizes could feasibly be halved by reducing the density to include additional housing blocks, or taller buildings, while retaining the overall number of men in the complex. DISCUSSION: The methods discussed can potentially be utilised to estimate transmission dynamics at any high-density accommodation site with the availability of case and serology data. The restructuring of infrastructure to reduce the number of residents per room can dramatically slow down epidemics, and therefore should be considered by policymakers as a long-term intervention.

Positive impact of oral hydroxychloroquine and povidone-iodine throat spray for COVID-19 prophylaxis: An open-label randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: We examined whether existing licensed pharmacotherapies could reduce the spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). METHODS: An open-label parallel randomized controlled trial was performed among healthy migrant workers quarantined in a large multi-storey dormitory in Singapore. Forty clusters (each defined as individual floors of the dormitory) were randomly assigned to receive a 42-day prophylaxis regimen of either oral hydroxychloroquine (400 mg once, followed by 200 mg/day), oral ivermectin (12 mg once), povidone-iodine throat spray (3 times/day, 270 µg/day), oral zinc (80 mg/day)/vitamin C (500 mg/day) combination, or oral vitamin C, 500 mg/day. The primary outcome was laboratory evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection as shown by either: (1) a positive serologic test for SARS-CoV-2 antibody on day 42, or (2) a positive PCR test for SARS-CoV-2 at any time between baseline and day 42. RESULTS: A total of 3037 asymptomatic participants (mean age, 33.0 years; all men) who were seronegative to SARS-CoV-2 at baseline were included in the primary analysis. Follow-up was nearly complete (99.6%). Compared with vitamin C, significant absolute risk reductions (%, 98.75% confidence interval) were observed for oral hydroxychloroquine (21%, 2-42%) and povidone-iodine throat spray (24%, 7-39%). No statistically significant differences were observed with oral zinc/vitamin C combination (23%, -5 to +41%) and ivermectin (5%, -10 to +22%). Interruptions due to side effects were highest among participants who received zinc/vitamin C combination (6.9%), followed by vitamin C (4.7%), povidone-iodine (2.0%), and hydroxychloroquine (0.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Chemoprophylaxis with either oral hydroxychloroquine or povidone-iodine throat spray was superior to oral vitamin C in reducing SARS-CoV-2 infection in young and healthy men.